IETF-LDAPext Thread Index
(200406)
[Chronological Index]
[Top]
Last update: Wed Oct 27 17:13:00 2004
93 threaded messages
- larger stock returns,
Nora Westbrook
- ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder,
mailman-owner
- cardiology, radiology,,
Regina Cornett
- Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt,
Alexandre PAUZIES
- doctors,physicians,& American doctors directoty,
Suzette Poe
- FW: Mórtgage Application,
Jaime Dempsey
- The Results of Your Survey,
Shelby Cohen
- [ldapext] draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-java-api-19.txt,
Steve Sonntag
- 2004 doctors American directoty,physicians,,
Suzanne Oneal
- [ldapext] LDIFv2,
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- PLEASE ASSIST TRANSFER.,
o_kenneth
- [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries,
Jim Sermersheim
- Status: Approved,
Deanna Street
- [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class,
Hallvard B Furuseth
- [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched,
Jim Sermersheim
- Application Form Accepted,
Carolyn Burke
- university degrees for sale here,
Leticia Macdonald
- Re: kong diagnostic,
Dannie
- Your confirm code is: #M854,
Angelo Stevenson
- Economy is much better now,
Dominique Contreras
- [no subject],
Alison
- Pre-Qualified M[o]rtgage Application,
Dina Dukes
- lime,
Mccain
- Re:,
Etta
- Re: disdainful lovelorn,
Dominique
- Incredible Software Deals. berenices sabra coed condemnate,
Charity Hodges
- [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Mark Ennis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Mark Ennis
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ennis, Mark
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ennis, Mark
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Jim Sermersheim
- RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?),
Ramsay, Ron
- Application Approved,
Chris Vera
- Re: orphic bloop,
Adeline
- [ldapext] superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation,
Jim Sermersheim
- ref DN != reference name (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Jim Sermersheim
- [ldapext] Re: superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation,
Ennis, Mark
- Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Jim Sermersheim
- Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Ennis, Mark
- Re: Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Ennis, Mark
- [ldapext] ChainedOperation.targetObject (are nssr's required)?,
Jim Sermersheim
- [ldapext] searchable archive?,
Jim Sermersheim
- [ldapext] Distributed Procedures Requirements,
Jim Sermersheim
- chaining binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Jim Sermersheim
- Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Jim Sermersheim
- Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)),
Kurt D. Zeilenga
- [ldapext] Is exclude subtree useful outside of chained operations?,
Jim Sermersheim
[Chronological Index]
[Top]