[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

chaining binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))

To: "Ed Reed" <ereed@novell.com>
Subject: chaining binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:55:02 -0700
Cc: Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE.PRV-6.PROVO@novell.com>, ldapext@ietf.org, mark.ennis@adacel.com
In-reply-to: <s0dbe43a.014@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
References: <s0dbe43a.014@sinclair.provo.novell.com>

At 07:37 AM 6/25/2004, Ed Reed wrote:
>Or am I off in la-la-land, again?

I think you're on target.

I'm going to pursue 2) separately for now.  That will allow
Jim and others to move forward on 1) without having to worry
about 2).

Kurt 


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

Prev by Date: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
Next by Date: Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread