Michael Ströder wrote:
Curt Blank wrote:What is wrong with my directory data? That is what I am trying to determine and fix.
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
Yeah well that's all fine and dandy but 2.0.27 didn't have this problemAt 12:58 PM 4/28/2005, Curt Blank wrote:
Now my question is, is this modification not allowed because I haveThe LDAP/X.500 information model does not allow changes to the
not allowed the Calendar application write access to the
structuralObjectClass attribute, or is it not allowed period?
structural object class of an object. slapd(8) enforces this
aspect of the model.
and now because slapd(8) enforces that this problem exists.
2.0.27 was not strict enough in this regard and did not properly
validate non-compliant input data. But still the problem is your
directory data and not newer versions of OpenLDAP.
You have to sanitize your data. Period. Otherwise you could have"sanitize your data" what does not mean? The data that is in there was put in there by v2.2.24 slapadd and I would think that if 2.2.24 did not like the data it would not have let me put it in in the first place. Yes no?
interoperability problems with other schema-aware LDAP applications as well.