[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter

To: Dustin Doris <openldap@mail.doris.name>
Subject: Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:02:41 -0300
Cc: Greg Matthews <gmatt@nerc.ac.uk>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20040716095111.N38793@mail.doris.name>
References: <40F6A2B1.5030703@agora.msa.fr> <84E50ED8B621DDC4F728878D@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <40F77CCA.7020402@agora.msa.fr> <1089968726.4175.3.camel@lea.nerc-wallingford.ac.uk> <20040716132941.GE24779@conectiva.com.br> <20040716095111.N38793@mail.doris.name>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:53:34AM -0400, Dustin Doris wrote:
> > I would love to and I'm about to throw in the towel and "break" this standard
> > schema by adding this (and other) rules. A broken or difficult standard is of
> > no use.
> >
> I have added that rule to some of my schemas because of the need to do <=
> and >= searches.  However, since I can't index a search like that, I do
> find them to be particularly slow, especially when I've got about 10,000
> records.

Hmm, why can't you index? Openldap doesn't support it or is it just a question
of changing the schema again?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: Dustin Doris <openldap@mail.doris.name>

References:
- >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: "Alexandre Garel" <garel.alexandre@agora.msa.fr>
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: "Alexandre Garel" <garel.alexandre@agora.msa.fr>
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: Greg Matthews <gmatt@nerc.ac.uk>
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
  - From: Dustin Doris <openldap@mail.doris.name>

Prev by Date: Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
Next by Date: Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread