[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:53:34AM -0400, Dustin Doris wrote:
> > I would love to and I'm about to throw in the towel and "break" this standard
> > schema by adding this (and other) rules. A broken or difficult standard is of
> > no use.
> >
> I have added that rule to some of my schemas because of the need to do <=
> and >= searches.  However, since I can't index a search like that, I do
> find them to be particularly slow, especially when I've got about 10,000
> records.

Hmm, why can't you index? Openldap doesn't support it or is it just a question
of changing the schema again?