[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: >= (greater or equal) and <= (lower or equal) operators in search filter
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Andreas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:53:34AM -0400, Dustin Doris wrote:
> > > I would love to and I'm about to throw in the towel and "break" this standard
> > > schema by adding this (and other) rules. A broken or difficult standard is of
> > > no use.
> > >
> > I have added that rule to some of my schemas because of the need to do <=
> > and >= searches. However, since I can't index a search like that, I do
> > find them to be particularly slow, especially when I've got about 10,000
> > records.
> Hmm, why can't you index? Openldap doesn't support it or is it just a question
> of changing the schema again?
Openldap doesn't support indexing like that.