* Andreas (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040706 17:42]: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:04:19PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > even if many distros leave their users out in the rain and save > > money by not providing a smooth upgrade path, debian does try to > > do that. there are attempts to parse the dumped ldif and upgrade > > it to the newer, stricter and more standards-compliant openldap > > 2.1 format, made by the responsible debian maintainers. > > And I'm absolutely certain that these same maintainers would *never* > upgrade openldap 2.0 to 2.1 or 2.2 in the same version of the distro. > > Upgrading distro A to distro A+1 is one thing: many other packages > get upgraded too. But upgrading just one (important) component inside > distro A is different, as I'm sure everybody is well aware. > that is not what i meant, either.
Description: PGP signature