[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:30:13 +0100
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20031208121021.027a7d88@127.0.0.1>
References: <HBF.20031207wnhs@bombur.uio.no> <6.0.0.22.0.20031207164114.027a7720@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20031208mkux@bombur.uio.no> <6.0.0.22.0.20031208121021.027a7d88@127.0.0.1>

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
> Hence, I believe that [ldapbis-bcp64] discussion of
> 'supportedFeatures' [Features] is not a sufficient reason
> to roll [Features] into the LDAP TS [Roadmap].

OK.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: protocol: placement of initial/final substrings
Next by Date: protocol/syntaxes: substrings
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread