[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: strict ldif check
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
In other words, you have software that was broken for the past 10 years
that RFC2251 was in effect, before RFC4511 was written to allow your
software vendor to get away with never fixing their broken code. Nice.
But IMO it's worth thinking about how to deal in slapd with the wording
"MAY or MAY NOT include the RDN attribute(s)" found in RFC4511 today.
Ultimately, there's nothing to think about. RFC2251 is now obsolete and
RFC4511 is the spec, so we'll have to change to comply. It's just a question
of someone who feels strongly enough getting motivated to write the patch.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/