[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: strict ldif check

Howard Chu wrote:
> In other words, you have software that was broken for the past 10 years
> that RFC2251 was in effect, before RFC4511 was written to allow your
> software vendor to get away with never fixing their broken code. Nice.

But IMO it's worth thinking about how to deal in slapd with the wording
"MAY or MAY NOT include the RDN attribute(s)" found in RFC4511 today.

Ciao, Michael.