[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Any plans for 2.4.9?

Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
><h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> wrote:
> Okay.  So do we want this in for 2.4.9?

Since it's an incompatible change I'd rather see it early in the release
cycle.  Even if the incompatibility is unlikely to hit many users.
Provided someone *tests* it on Windows, using back-ldif as a primary
backend with illegal filename characters in the DNs.  I can't.