[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Any plans for 2.4.9?
Howard Chu writes:
> Seems to me that we're just about there now. The only other issue I'd
> like to close out is 5383, assigning a public OID to the config
Do anyone have opinions about my questions in ITS#5408, back-ldif bugs?
In particular, how much and when should be rename the LDIF files?
(back-ldif is broken if it gets used as a regular backend so it gets
filenames with escape characters and the like.) If we rename files in
2.4 instead of punting to 2.5, it would be better if it happens early.