Re: memberOf overlay issues with 2.4.44 + ITS 8432 patch

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>]

Ok good to know!  The issue I created occurred when deleting the group, which I believe is the original complaint in the ITS as well. So I will add individual membership deletes as a part of that test too.

--Quanah

> On Dec 30, 2016, at 9:31 PM, Paul B. Henson <henson@acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 02:41:06PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> 
>> Well, it seems to be some sort of race condition.
> 
> Yes, I'd agree; probably also load dependent as I never triggered it on
> my dev systems which are mostly idle other than my test load. It only
> showed up on my prod systems which tend to have continuous load from
> various other things.
> 
>> I did want to confirm that you see this on servers that are long running 
>> (I.e., they've been running for a long time, and had other group deletes 
>> that went through w/o issue during that time).  If so, then I can modify 
>> the test to randomly add and delete groups as a part of the test, 
>> increasing the likelyhood of triggering the issue within the test.
> 
> I don't have too many deletions of group objects themselves in
> production, mostly just deletions of the members of groups. I didn't see
> any issues with group deletions in dev, or during some basic initial
> testing in prod. I'll go ahead and make a new test group, add some
> members to it, and then delete it and see what happens now that I've
> been running this code for about 3 weeks...
> 
> I didn't see any errors deleting a group, although there were these
> syncrepl messages that I don't believe used to show up:
> 
> Dec 30 21:23:29 themis slapd[2607]: syncrepl_message_to_op: rid=001 be_delete uid=ldaptest5,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu (32)
> Dec 30 21:23:29 themis slapd[2607]: syncrepl_message_to_op: rid=003 be_delete uid=ldaptest5,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu (32)
> Dec 30 21:23:29 themis slapd[2607]: syncrepl_message_to_op: rid=002 be_delete uid=ldaptest5,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu (32)
> 
> The group and memberOf attributes are gone on all four servers, so other
> than noise in the logs I'm not sure what these messages meant.
> 
>