[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: large ldap server recommendation

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0600, Ryan Horrisberger wrote:
> same as RH's packages and will replace them--but so far it works great, and
> the upgrade was flawless (you have to rebuild the DB since it is using an
> older [better] version of bdb), and yes the package RH ships is an
> embarrassment.

I'm curious: why do all these people who purchased (expensive) RH server
licenses don't open bug reports with Redhat about their openldap