[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: large ldap server recommendation
- Subject: Re: large ldap server recommendation
- From: Tony Earnshaw <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:13:35 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 (X11/20071031)
ram skrev, on 31-01-2008 11:13:
I am using ldap for authentication & addressbook for a large
mailserver setup with around 300k users ( this will grow to 500k )
The ldap server is a 8GB Ram box with RHEL-5 with
I am confused what database type to use ldbm or bdb. Currently I have
the users on bdb with lot of problems. The ldap server dies all of a
sudden and I have to recover the data to get it started
my DB_CONFIG file is
# Note: most DB_CONFIG settings will take effect only upon rebuilding
# the DB environment.
set_cachesize 0 524288000 0
# Note: special DB_CONFIG flags are no longer needed for "quick"
# slapadd(8) or slapindex(8) access (see their -q option).
This has been repeated to the point of boredom, nevertheless:
I'm a Red Hat admin and am running RHEL5.1 on a number of machines.
RHEL5 is a dependable and stable operating system, as are by far most of
the utilities it comprises. One RHEL5 offering to be avoided at all
costs is openldap-*-2.3.27. Apart from anything else it is built with
bdb 4.3.29 support. db4.3 has been condemned as unsuitable by the
OpenLDAP developers. There are other reason too, but this is the most
I (and other Red Hat admins in the know) run Buchan Milne's alternative
which comprise discrete, patched db-4.2.52 and can exist beside the
RHEL5 offering. This is an utterly stable and dependable product; it is
available at http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5Server/openldap/.
You should always use bdb or hdb as DB, never ldbm.
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl