[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, LDIF file difference...
My apologies. I meant to include this in my reply. It's a snippet from the
tailend of my inetorgperson.schema file (minus the trailing closing
paren...). Does anything look odd about this?
# The inetOrgPerson represents people who are associated with an
# organization in some way. It is a structural class and is derived
# from the organizationalPerson which is defined in X.521 [X521].
objectclass ( 2.16.840.1.1137184.108.40.206
DESC 'RFC2798: Internet Organizational Person'
audio $ businessCategory $ carLicense $ departmentNumber $
displayName $ employeeNumber $ employeeType $ givenName $
homePhone $ homePostalAddress $ initials $ jpegPhoto $
labeledURI $ mail $ manager $ mobile $ o $ pager $
photo $ roomNumber $ secretary $ uid $ userCertificate $
x500uniqueIdentifier $ preferredLanguage $
userSMIMECertificate $ userPKCS12 )
Behalf Of Turbo Fredriksson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, LDIF file difference...
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Denton <email@example.com> writes:
Dan> modifying entry "cn=jjohnson,ou=users,dc=remitpro,dc=local"
Dan> ldap_modify: Invalid syntax (21) additional info:
Dan> objectclass: value #1 invalid per syntax
I got that once (or twice) when the LDAP server was missing an
objectclass definition. Are you loading all schema's?