[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, LDIF file difference...
Thanks to all who replied. Evidently the order in which you include the
schemas makes a difference. After putting them in this order, it worked...
From: CHANG Shuh [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:08 PM
To: Dan Denton
Subject: RE: upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, LDIF file difference...
Try some hints discussed from this link:
Senior Systems Architect
Security, Network Identity
Tel: +1 512-257-3859
Fax: +1 512-257-3904
9442 Capital of Texas Highway North
Arboretum Plaza II, Suite 400
Austin, Texas 78759
> -----Original Message-----
> rg] On Behalf Of Dan Denton
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 1:28 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, LDIF file difference...
> Hello list,
> I've moved from a 2.2 installation to a 2.3.38 installation,
> and am having a problem loading one of my old LDIF files. The
> user in question was the only one I attempted to use the
> inetOrgPerson object class on, and the program seems to have
> a problem with it. When I attempt to import it, I get:
> modifying entry "cn=jjohnson,ou=users,dc=remitpro,dc=local"
> ldap_modify: Invalid syntax (21)
> additional info: objectclass: value #1 invalid per syntax
> In the FAQ-o-matic, there's mention of this issue and the OP
> was directed to a link pointing out what can cause it. For reference:
> There's no whitespace at the end of each line, there's no
> empty attributes, and I've eliminated any characters that I
> thought might pose an issue. Any help is greatly appreciated.
> Here's the LDIF file:
> dn: cn=jjohnson,ou=users,dc=remitpro,dc=local
> objectclass: person
> objectclass: inetOrgPerson
> objectClass: posixAccount
> cn: jjohnson
> cn: Jim Johnson
> sn: Johnson
> uid: jjohnson
> userPassword: secret
> uidNumber: 513
> gidNumber: 513
> title: Lackey
> telephoneNumber: 4028610005
> mail: email@example.com
> gn: Jim
> displayName: Jim Johnson
> initials: JJ
> o: RemitPro Inc
> ou: users
> postalAddress: 3925 S 147th St
> postalCode: 68138
> l: Omaha
> st: NE
> Thanks in advance...
> P.S. - I've also tried using the syntax available at the
> following link, with no luck.