[Date Prev][Date Next]
Fix for ITS4664 not included in 2.3.28, why?
is there any particular (technical)
reason why the fix for ITS4664 (dynlist memleak) has not been included
in 2.3.28? I was just wondering how big/serious that leak is, since I'm
in the process of upgrading our servers from 2.3.27 to 2.328 and I might
as well include the dynlist.c from HEAD.
Although they've been running on 2.3.27
with dynlist since its release and we haven't experienced any memory shortages