[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5
Dennis Misc wrote:
I just wanted to be clear.. So it's worse off in having an outdated
master,As noted here
OpenLDAP 2.3.20 and newer will generate the missing operational
attributes, so it will accept replication from any previous version.
than having an outdated slave. I've also browsed through the faq-o-matic,
and there doesn't seem to be a replication guide between different
of OpenLDAP. (specifically *2.0.21 to 2.3.19*).
If I somehow missed it, please let me know if you happen to have a
of the docs.
>Since the 2.0 system is the master and the 2.3 is the slave,
>isn't it possible this would be a non-issue?
Then have a worse issue. The master won't generate
all the operational attributes required by the slave.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/