[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: alock + ldbm in 2.3.21

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:10 PM -0400 matthew sporleder
> <msporleder@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> > Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 658149 local6.debug]
>>> > ldbm_back_db_open: alock package is unstable; database may be
>>> > inconsistent!
>>> > Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 100111 local6.debug]
>>> > slapd starting
> 
> I would really rethink using LDBM, especially since you are upgrading to
> a modern version of OpenLDAP.
> 
> Now that you've started slapd, and alock is created, does LDBM continue
> to complain, or are things happy?

Just for the records: OpenLDAP often complains about alock package even
when using back-bdb or back-hdb.

Ciao, Michael.