Re: alock + ldbm in 2.3.21

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>]

--On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:33 PM -0400 matthew sporleder 
<msporleder@gmail.com> wrote:

> Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 658149 local6.debug]
> ldbm_back_db_open: alock package is unstable; database may be
> inconsistent!
> Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 100111 local6.debug]
> slapd starting
>
>
> Can I get a status on alock for LDBM?
>
> According to:
> http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/alock.c?hideattic=
> 1&sortbydate=0
>
> it looks like ldbm is having some alock rethinks.  Should I wait for
> ldbm to be re-stabilized in 2.3.x?

LDBM is going to be removed from OpenLDAP 2.4, and there are many reasons 
not to use LDBM (stability, etc).  I would rethink why you are using LDBM 
in the first place (not that the problem you are reporting doesn't need to 
be addressed).


--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html