Re: syncrepl w/ 2.3 and bdb 4.3 working great

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>]

--On Tuesday, September 13, 2005 5:29 PM -0400 Dusty Doris 
<openldap@mail.doris.cc> wrote:

> For now, I have elected to use bdb as the backend as its working great
> with my testing.
>
> BTW - with bdb as the backend instead of hdb, I the same test as I was
> before for using syncrepl and compared the two database to the master.
> They all checked out, so replication still looks fine in either of these
> scenarios for me (bdb 4.2 or 4.3 w/ bdb as the backend).

You don't want to use back-hdb until 2.3.8.  Howard & I profiled HDB and it 
is now 4.6 times faster than it was previously.  It is on par with back-bdb 
at that level.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin