[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: 2.2.23 vs 2.3.1alpha speed compairisons
--On Monday, February 21, 2005 6:39 PM -0500 Samuel Tran <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Here a extract of my slapd.conf:
checkpoint 512 720
If you have 4,000 entries, why would you try and cache 100,000? You're
never going to fill that. I also don't see any idlcachesize setting here.
index objectClass,uid,uidNumber,gidNumber,memberUid eq
index cn,mail,surname,givenname eq,subinitial
The indexing necessary depends entirely on the searches you are performing.
I would check that your logs to see if you are getting any index_param
failed messages, which would mean inadequate indexing for the requested
Here is the content of my DB_CONFIG:
set_cachesize 0 52428800 0
We are starting with less than 4,000 entries in our LDAP directory.
I would assume that is fine for now, but that's just an assumption. ;)
Also, is the 350 queries/second from a single process doing the query, or
multiple processes? A single process querying will never give you the full
results of the servers performance.
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: