[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: About Buffer Overflows
> I would note that OL 2.1.19 is quite old at this point
> (and the OL 2.1 line is deprecated).
So does it mean OL 2.1 line is unsafe in buffer overflow problem?
If use 2.1.19, buffer overflow may occur in somewhere which has
not been detected (or you didn't know clearly)?
Also you cannot assure that there isn't buffer overflow problem
in the release from 2.2.0 to 2.2.22? But currently, the safer release
is OL 2.2.23 or later.
Please give me suggestion.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:26:47 -0800
Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com> wrote:
> I would assume that OpenLDAP 2.1 and 2.2 releases are safe from any 2.0
> vulnerabilities. I would note that OL 2.1.19 is quite old at this point
> (and the OL 2.1 line is deprecated). Also note that there is a different
> problem in the OL 2.1 tree, and all OL releases prior to OL 2.2.23. I
> would suggest using OL 2.2.23 or later.