[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: 2.2.23 vs 2.3.1alpha speed compairisons


On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 16:47, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
> I tried another run with logging turned on, but using bigger buffers as suggested above - performance was still horrible.  I saw very little improvement.
> On the plus side, I rebuilt 2.3.1alpha against BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 - and its performance is pretty much equal to that of the 2.2.23, for my little tests anyway.
> Has anyone filed a bug with Sleepycat about this?  It seems like a pretty major thing for OpenLdap users.

Do you mean that you have better performance with 2.3.1alpha + BDB
4.2.52 than with 2.3.1.alpha + BDB 4.3.27?

Thanks for your benchmarks.

Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>
Systems Administration - Information Technology
American Museum of Natural History
(P) 212-313-7231 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part