[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem

To: openldap-software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
From: John Morris <openldap@butchwax.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:37:21 -0600
In-reply-to: <7FA17BC3BB35991F2A4D3DAE@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
References: <1105126427.13919.330.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49B2AA99EE432F09D4EB9A05@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <1105127955.13919.345.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7FA17BC3BB35991F2A4D3DAE@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>

On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 12:17 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > Can you replicate from a 2.2.x master to a 2.0.x slave?
> 
> I don't believe so.
> 
> > Can you use the syncrepl mechanism to keep a 2.2.x slave synced with a
> > 2.0.x master?
> 
> 2.0.x doesn't support syncRepl.  It was a new feature in 2.2.

Huh, so then there's no way to upgrade from 2.0->2.2 on a live network
of openldap servers.  Luckily, our LDAP system is not often written to
at the moment.

I sure appreciate the quick answers.  Have a great weekend!

	John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
  - From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>

References:
- Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
  - From: John Morris <openldap@butchwax.com>
- Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
  - From: John Morris <openldap@butchwax.com>
- Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: Multiple syncrepl problems
Next by Date: Re: Slurpd replication 2.0->2.2 problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread