[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Multiple syncrepl problems
--On Friday, January 07, 2005 1:25 PM -0700 Darren Gamble
Thanks for your reply!
> Is LDAP Sync Replication considered stable on OpenLDAP, or should we
> instead be using traditional slurpd replication?
My own opinion is I would wait for OpenLDAP 2.3 to use
syncRepl. Note that
a number of bugs I discovered in syncRepl in 2.3 were fixed
in OL 2.2.20 as
well by Howard Chu, so you may want to look at upgrading.
As I noted in the second half of my message, I did attempt to use 2.2.20,
to great failure.
I would love to give 2.2.20 or even a CVS copy (wouldn't be the first
time) a go, if I could find out why no entries are being replicated with
it. Do those error messages make any sense to anyone?
Thanks also for your advice on syncrepl.
In 2.3.0 alpha I'm having an issue where new entries are not replicated
unless I stop and start all replica's. MOD's are never replicated (see
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin