[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: LDAP server redundancy
Am Freitag, 6. Dezember 2002 16:05 schrieb Tony Earnshaw:
> If you use BIND DNS for your name resolution (at least with BIND 9 and
> greater, although I've been forcibly dragged by the short and curlies
> through 4.7+ and 8.1+ and have with relief forgotten them) and use 2
> zone A records with the same FQDN, each with a different IP number, an
> elementary round robin will be used.
Only if the local resolver doesn't cache the results. DNS is the worst
place for load balancing.
OT rant: BIND is a bug-ridden (countless times exploited), memory hogging
piece of bloatware that should have been replaced by something small and
secure a long time ago. Get rid of it.