[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Suggest slapd loglevel



On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:26:46 -0500 (CDT)
Caylan Van Larson <caylan@cs.und.edu> wrote:

> > > openldap-2.0.9

> > Consider upgrading to at least openldap 2.0.25.  I don't think
> > anyone here is interested in tracking down bugs that have likely
> > been fixed already.

> WHAT!!!

> Please now someone explain to me how the bleeping versions are laid
> out?  I wanted the latest 2.0 branch and settled for 2.0.9 (largest
> digit..?)  How wrong I was, why is the naming so weird on there?
> There must be some convention that I do not know of.

Think of the dot in multidot software revisions as a comma rather than
radix point.

version 2, release 0, patch 9

versus

version 2, release 0, patch 25

Matthew Backes
lucca@csun.edu