[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Suggest slapd loglevel
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:26:46 -0500 (CDT)
Caylan Van Larson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > openldap-2.0.9
> > Consider upgrading to at least openldap 2.0.25. I don't think
> > anyone here is interested in tracking down bugs that have likely
> > been fixed already.
> Please now someone explain to me how the bleeping versions are laid
> out? I wanted the latest 2.0 branch and settled for 2.0.9 (largest
> digit..?) How wrong I was, why is the naming so weird on there?
> There must be some convention that I do not know of.
Think of the dot in multidot software revisions as a comma rather than
version 2, release 0, patch 9
version 2, release 0, patch 25