[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
At 04:52 AM 2002-11-09, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>> How about ;lang-x-hidden and some ACLs? No coding required.
>Hm? It isn't a language. Sounds like an abuse of "lang".
>Besides, I just finished coding user-defined attribute options: Since I
>thought I'd have to implement a new option anyway, I could just as well
I suggest that each of these user-defined attribute options have
a common prefix (e.g, ";x-user"). Coding wise, they would be
just like language tag/range options... except the option name
would have user defined meaning.
>ACLs: Good idea. This now gives the effect I want:
> attributeoption x-hidden
> access to cn;x-hidden,sn;x-hidden,givenName;x-hidden,ou;x-hidden by * search
>The ACL gets a bit cumbersome if many attributes use x-hidden, but I
>guess I might leave it at that.
access to attrs=name;x-user-hidden ...