[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Suggestion: attribute;search

Pierangelo Masarati writes:
> What about ";x-search" ?

Right, good catch.  Non-standardized options should have an "x-" prefix.

BTW, maybe ;x-hidden is better, since it is reads and not search filters
which treat it specially.  (Modify operations would have to see it.)

Also, I guess there should be an LDAP control which says that the
search should return those attributes anyway.