[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal

To: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:40:33 +0200
Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <46EF0DDF.4090806@padl.com>
References: <20070917143336.GA7266@tile.skills-1st.co.uk> <46EF07BD.1010801@padl.com> <22F5E36297524347B40AFAA7CDD4CB4D01F08F0B@G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net> <46EF0DDF.4090806@padl.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4

Luke Howard wrote:
> I suppose another approach would be to redefine groupOfNames with a new
> OID?

No! Most applications do not look at the OID.

Ciao, Michael.

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

References:
- [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
  - From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>
- Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
  - From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
- RE: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
  - From: "Neal-Joslin, Robert (HP-UX Lab R&D)" <bob.joslin@hp.com>
- Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
  - From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
Next by Date: Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread