[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] CLDAPv3: A slightly different approach

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 03:56:39PM +0100, Leif Johansson wrote:
> 
> 1. You can't do bind over UDP in any sensible way. You won't get away
> with specifying plain password mechs in this day and age and SASL requires
> a connection.

I haven't looked enough at these things, but I wonder if one could reuse
mechanisms from SNMP? Something like HMAC-SHA or HMAC-MD5, See sections 6
and 7 of RFC 3414.

Stig

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext