Re: [ldapext] CLDAPv3: A slightly different approach

[Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>]

Stig Venaas wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 03:56:39PM +0100, Leif Johansson wrote:
>  
>
> > 1. You can't do bind over UDP in any sensible way. You won't get away
> > with specifying plain password mechs in this day and age and SASL requires
> > a connection.
> >    
>
> I haven't looked enough at these things, but I wonder if one could reuse
> mechanisms from SNMP? Something like HMAC-SHA or HMAC-MD5, See sections 6
> and 7 of RFC 3414.
>
> Stig
>
>  
That was my idea. That way you can also make sure you are not loosing 
response pdus.

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext