I don't have a strong opinion either way. It should be noted that the storedPrefixMatch is not defined in X.520:1993 so it can't be rolled into [Syntaxes]. If the Chairs want to declare that there is consensus on including all the rules from RFC 3698, except for storedPrefixMatch, then I'll take care of it.
Regards, Steven
People are puzzled as to why the RFC 3698 rules are missing from [Syntaxes] (I saw this happen just last week). I vote (unless there are problems with doing so) to add them.
Jim
Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 9/27/04 2:24:54 AM
Will the matching rules from RFC 3698 be included in [Syntaxes]? It was discussed in thread 'Protocol: Rolling in recent updates' in December; Kurt had a list of suggested 'SHOULD/MAY implement'.