Re: [Syntaxes] += RFC 3698?

["Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com>]

People are puzzled as to why the RFC 3698 rules are missing from
[Syntaxes] (I saw this happen just last week). I vote (unless there are
problems with doing so) to add them.

Jim

>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 9/27/04 2:24:54 AM
>>>
Will the matching rules from RFC 3698 be included in [Syntaxes]?
It was discussed in thread 'Protocol: Rolling in recent updates'
in December; Kurt had a list of suggested 'SHOULD/MAY implement'.

-- 
Hallvard