[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Models: aliases
At 03:15 AM 1/31/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>> It seems rather heavy to force people to get their
>>> own OID and make new object classes just in order
>>> to use aliases, if extensibleObject is not supported
>>> on their server.
>> Some could publish a "Common subclasses of 'alias'"
>> technical specification....
>Good idea. Though it seems enough with one subclass 'namedAlias'
>with several MAY attributes.
Actually, I think one would one to create one subclass of
alias for each class used in aliased object. That is,
personAlias, inetOrgPersonAlias, ...
so that one can better place structure rules/name forms.
>...or a 'namedObject' auxiliary class with those MAY attributes.
>What's the advantage of a subclass over an auxiliary class?
structure rules/name forms.