[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Models: aliases

At 09:49 AM 1/29/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Is this a correct alias entry:
>  dn: o=foo
>  objectclass: alias
>  aliasedObjectName: o=bar
>or should it also contain the attribute
>  o: foo
>?

yes.  And you need another objectClass.


>If the original entry is correct, it violates 2.2.1 in [Models]:
>  These AVAs [in the RDN] are chosen from the attributes of the
>  entry.

Not the case.

>If "o: foo" should be added, it violates the description of the
>'alias' object class (2.6.1), which does not allow attribute 'o'.

You need to add extensibleObject, an objectClass
which SUPs alias and allows o, or adjust your DIT
content rules to allow o in alias entries.

Kurt