Re: Q: different SSF settings for ldapi:// than for ldap:

To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Q: different SSF settings for ldapi:// than for ldap:
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:24:03 +0200
In-reply-to: <5519151E020000A100019A56@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
References: <55150F5F020000A1000199DC@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de> <5517CFFB.3050906@stroeder.com> <5519151E020000A100019A56@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33.1

Ulrich Windl wrote:

Michael Ströder<michael@stroeder.com> schrieb am 29.03.2015 um 12:12 in

I have this in my config:

# SSF value for ldapi://
localSSF 256


What I don't understand here is: Doesn't "256" _require_ encryption for
ldapi:// then?


There is a reason for everything I write, especially this sentence:

>> See slapd.conf(5) for details.

Learn to read the fine docs.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

References:
- Q: different SSF settings for ldapi:// than for ldap:
  - From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
- Re: Q: different SSF settings for ldapi:// than for ldap:
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>