[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: different hdbs for ou

Denny Fuchs wrote:
> Am 01.11.2013 um 12:33 schrieb Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>:
>> Denny Fuchs wrote:
>>> Am 01.11.2013 um 12:02 schrieb Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>:
>>>> Why do you want to have separate databases?
>>>> What does "use" mean in this context?
>>> for a easier file and database management. They may need different DB
>>> options or indexes as we need, so I want to split every departure from our
>>> main DB.
>> I'd clarify requirements *before* doing the hassle dealing with separate
>> databases. If you really have to deal with DB files on department level you're
>> doing something wrong in your deployment.
> Ok :-) What speaks against that ?

It's more complex. You might run into issues with overlays not fully
compatible with glueing subordinate DBs.

You have to plan MDB size of separate DBs when using back-mdb.


> I also think, it make ACL much more easier (=readable, because not in the main hdb which has already a lot of acls)

There are no significant differences regardings readable ACLs when using
separate DBs.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature