[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-config, includes

Howard Chu wrote:

You're welcome to suggest something else. There's no reason that the character used in the filesystem needs to be the same as the one in the DIT, but it would be a bad idea to make the DIT representation vary.

One quick approach is to allow custom replacement of chars from DIT to FS and forth. One could freely remap "=", "{", "}". and any other offending char (something like autoconf rewriting all FS-specific chars to "_", but reversible).


   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497