[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: delta-synrepl consumer randomly delete objects
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: delta-synrepl consumer randomly delete objects
- From: Raffael Sahli <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:37:43 +0100
- In-reply-to: <D1549F172FD7F1132AB8FB27@[192.168.1.19]>
- References: <58086FE6.email@example.com> <WMfirstname.lastname@example.org> <19088BA1D7D832B5559045F3@[192.168.1.19]> <email@example.com> <WMfirstname.lastname@example.org> <5605D7AD7A7B55A8CC4F2AB9@[192.168.1.19]> <581B1CA3.email@example.com> <WMfirstname.lastname@example.org> <D1549F172FD7F1132AB8FB27@[192.168.1.19]>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
On 11/03/2016 04:02 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, November 03, 2016 1:16 PM +0100 Raffael Sahli
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I have no clue what changed that we have now such problems.
>> What else is related to (delta)-syncrepl? time?
>> Could it be wrong/strange slapd configurations? (acl, limits,
>> syncrepl,...) But actually not much changed and the sync does work for
>> some time...
> "time" must be in sync between all nodes, that's well documented.
Yeah, time is in sync between all server. Always was.
> If your pulling down an empty replica from a master, then that is not
> using delta-sycnrepl at all. I've never had luck with doing that. I
> only do a slapcat from the master then slapadd to the replica, and
> start from there.
Was never a problem in my openldap history :), but aight I will check it
via slapcat but I'm pretty sure thats not the point.
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Product Architect
> Symas Corporation
> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: