Victor Sudakov wrote: > Michael Str?der wrote: >>> Michael Str?der wrote: >>>>> "Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send" is >>>>> a good old rule. >>>> >>>> If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the client. >>> >>> I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the >>> ordering of the 'cn' attribute. >> >> Actually the client could request that. > > The client does request that, it seems, but OpenLDAP produces an error. > It requests a SortKeyList control on the attribute 'cn'. But OpenLDAP > returns an error. No it does not what I meant.. > Here is the conversation for you inline: > [..] > Control > controlType: 1.2.840.113522.214.171.1243 (sortKeyList) > criticality: True > SortKeyList: 1 item > SortKeyList item > attributeType: cn > Control > controlType: 2.16.840.1.1137126.96.36.199 (LDAP_CONTROL_VLVREQUEST VLV) > controlValue: 308400000012020100020127a08400000006020101020100 ..as you can see above. Please read my posting more thoroughly. Ciao, Michael.
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature