[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook
Michael Str?der wrote:
> >>>>> "Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send" is
> >>>>> a good old rule.
> >>>> If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the client.
> >>> I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the
> >>> ordering of the 'cn' attribute.
> >> Actually the client could request that.
> > The client does request that, it seems, but OpenLDAP produces an error.
> > It requests a SortKeyList control on the attribute 'cn'. But OpenLDAP
> > returns an error.
> No it does not what I meant..
> > Here is the conversation for you inline:
> > [..]
> > Control
> > controlType: 1.2.840.1135126.96.36.1993 (sortKeyList)
> > criticality: True
> > SortKeyList: 1 item
> > SortKeyList item
> > attributeType: cn
> > Control
> > controlType: 2.16.840.1.1137188.8.131.52 (LDAP_CONTROL_VLVREQUEST VLV)
> > controlValue: 308400000012020100020127a08400000006020101020100
> ..as you can see above. Please read my posting more thoroughly.
Please rephrase your posting in more mundane words.
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN