Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, December 10, 2012 8:59 AM +0700 Victor Sudakov > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Michael Str?der wrote: >>> > Michael Str?der wrote: >>> >>> "Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send" is >>> >>> a good old rule. >>> >> >>> >> If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the >>> >> client. >>> > >>> > I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the >>> > ordering of the 'cn' attribute. >>> >>> Actually the client could request that. >> >> The client does request that, it seems, but OpenLDAP produces an error. >> It requests a SortKeyList control on the attribute 'cn'. But OpenLDAP >> returns an error. > > No, it is not requesting it. You can request the rule you want as part of the > filter. See > <http://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=slapcat&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenLDAP+2.4-Release&format=html> > for an example of a filter that specifies the matching rule in a filter. In this case 'orderingRule' in the SSS request control has to be set. The search filter is not relevant here. Ciao, Michael.
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature