[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: sasl issue - but I don't want sasl atm
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:59 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 10:44:56 Da Rock wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 01:48 +0200, Michael Ströder wrote:
> > > Da Rock wrote:
> > > > so I'm trying to
> > > > work out how to setup the system to do a simple bind
> > >
> > > ldapsearch -x -D <bind-DN>
> > I know that, thanks, but this is affecting other apps from obtaining
> > data from the system. I can also just go ldapsearch -x for anonymous. It
> > appears I'm all in or bust! Unless I can set it up so apps can do simple
> > bind...
> If you can do a simple bind (anonymous, or authenticated), there (in most
> cases) is nothing preventing other applications from doing simple binds.
> Having SASL support compiled in to the server does not prevent other
> applications for doing simple binds.
> Maybe you should provide more information about the applications in question,
> and how they are configured.
> (Note: In the past Apple's LDAP client software for Mac OS seems to use
> whichever SASL mechanisms are advertised by the LDAP server, but this again
> isn't about SASL support being compiled in or not).
Thats what I would have figured, yet I get no joy, nothing I can see out
of the ordinary in the logs, and all the apps are auth types (courier,
pam, postfix)- plus records for bind.
Bind doesn't bind to the ldap, and I'm trying to setup the others to do
the same. Obviously, courier has to bind to confirm auth- but only as
the user (not bind as courier, then again as the user).
Bind works: tested that myself. The others fail miserably.
I'm not entirely sure what else I need to add exactly, the platform is
freebsd with openldap built with sasl from ports.
Before anyone suggests it, I already have a mail server running
(postfix, courier); I want ldap as lookup source to ease administration.
The pam is completely new to me, I'm following a lot of howtos on the
web to compile a picture of how it all works.
Now as to pam, I thought it must be my ineptitude in configuration, so I
put it on hold and moved to something easier. Unfortunately I hit a
similar snag there with the imap auth, hence I looked at the ldapsearch
angle. Seems I could be wrong there based on comments received....