[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: should I modify attribute definition in core.schema to suit my need?
Pierangelo Masarati writes:
>Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>> I don't understand why 'c' do have the superior 'NAME'. (...)
> (...) With respect to 'c' being defined that way, that's how it's
> defined in RFC4519 (...) you can set the right values and you can
> exploit inheritance (...)
One note: inheritance here means that in some cases when you specify
NAME you get C too. E.g. a search for (name=GB) also finds 'c: GB'.