[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: which version to consider "stable?"
John Madden wrote:
2.3.16/bdb has now run here for more than 24 hours without a failure, so it's at
the very least a whole lot better than 2.3.11 was. (This is on Linux 2.6, bdb
4.2, 100,000+ objects, ~4 million operations a day.)
And just hours after sending this, slapd hung. This behavior's different than
what I had been seeing before: slapd hangs at 100% cpu usage, eventually refusing
At loglevel 256, nothing of any use is revealed. Is there some level I can safely
turn on to help debug this problem? Will the upgrade to 2.3.17 help?
I'm using the default thread count and I noticed that at higher thread levels,
this CPU situation would happen sometimes within a couple of hours. Should I go
even lower than 16, or is this another Linux-2.6 issue where I should consider
using 2.4 instead?
There's not enough info here to tell. Attach with gdb and get a trace of
all the threads.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/