[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: proxyAttrSet: Only using the LAST value
>>>>> "Pierangelo" == Pierangelo Masarati <email@example.com> writes:
Pierangelo> I think you need different indices for different
Pierangelo> proxyattrset, e.g
I figured that, but I wanted to be absolutely sure. That complicates
matters, but is feasible. Any plans on simplifying this (my way :)?
Pierangelo> I'm not sure about what you can do for that in 2.2,
Pierangelo> but note that even 2.3 is not going to forward sasl
Pierangelo> authentication anyway. All it's going to do is to
Pierangelo> proxyAuthz __local__ identities, optionally using a
Pierangelo> SASL bind as administrative user. I don't think
Pierangelo> proxying SASL binds is at all possible.
He! You said that last time to, and Howard corrected you :).
Just to be sure. Did something change? Neither of you seemed perfectly
sure exactly HOW things where...
Maybe I should say 'GSSAPI' here on instead of 'SASL'. I don't care
about anything else than Kerberos V right now :)
And don't nag about that, my girlfriend is already doing that :D
Could you please elaborate on what you mean by 'proxyAuthz __local__ identities'?