[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Building 2.2.19 from source
--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 2:58 PM -0700 Craig White
following Quanah's information
On RHEL 3 (openssl-0.9.7a-33.12)
is there any reason to build openssl-.97e from source or can I just link
stuff to the one in place by Red Hat?
if the answer is to build it from source (and my experiences of building
from source have always been simpler projects) then...
his suggested ./config options are:
env CC=gcc LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib" \
PERL=/usr/local/bin/perl LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib \
Now I know that perl is in /usr/bin/
and shared solaris-sparcv9-gcc isn't for me
So my questions (I have only built easier items from source):
1 - shared linux ?
2 - LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib ?
3 - Does this make sense to do all this?
4 - Is there a reason to go through the extra hassle of making rpms?
5 - Anything else I need to know?
Can I continue to ask questions of this list about building the
prerequisites without getting people upset at me?
I'd just ask me directly. ;)
As noted near the top
disclaimer), the options are for how I build OpenLDAP & its pre-requisite
software (which at the moment is on Solaris, and not on Linux), and I push
everything into /usr/local on systems that are dedicated solely to ldap, so
that changes to the system libraries (kept in mind for things like debian &
redhat) won't affect how my software itself works.
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin