[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Creating empty groupOfUniqueNames..
Michael Ströder wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
I want to create a set of groups that will be used for authorization
purposes. To me, it seems that a groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames
best serve this purpose. (Better suggestions?) However, both object
require at least one member attribute. There will be times though
member is not known. How do you handle this?
Right now I create all groups with an invalid member attribute:
Does this break any convention? Is there a better way to handle this?
what I usually do is add the DN of the group itself.
Hmm, this could lead to problems with software which resolves nested
A software that isn't able to trace such a simple loop is likely to fail
whatever trick you use.
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497